Baselining
|
Previous Top Next |
Setting
|
Effect
|
If the baselining width
value is too large ...
|
... the background will not be eliminated efficiently because
the minima found during the baselining process are not due to
the base points of the local peaks.
As a result the peaks will remain on a background noise.
|
If the baselining width
value is too small ...
|
... severe artifacts are generated!
If the baseline width is smaller than the width of a peak, the
local minimum values in the center of a peak will be detected
in the peak flank regions.
This leads to split peaks (see example with baselining width
10 and 20 below).
|
Format
|
Example
|
Fig. 1. Smoothed raw data
The raw data has already been
smoothed.
The peaks are sitting on a
background as indicated in green
color.
|
|
Fig. 2. Baselining width set to 10
Here the baselining width value is too
low. This results in split peaks and
drastic reduction of the peak heights.
Too low!
|
|
Fig. 3. Baselining width set to 20
Here the baselining width value is still
too low. Both peaks are still split their
height is too small.
Still too low!
|
|
Fig. 4. Baselining width set to 50
The entire background is removed.
The peaks are not split and they sit
on the baseline.
Best!
|
|
Fig. 5. Baselining width set to 100
No split peaks. Peaks sit on base
line. Background removed.
Still good!
|
|
Fig. 6. Baselining width set to 500
The baselining width value is too
great and, therefore, the peaks do not
sit on the baseline.
Too great!
|
|